PLOS ONE is the journal of choice for authors who want their research to be available to all, immediately and without restriction. Plos one accepts science that is done well with no glaring issues. I’m not sure how much price is a differentiator for megajournals like PLOS ONE, at least in comparison to other factors. Just host the paper on your webpage and forget about journals altogether, rather than paying some third tier open source journal to publish it. Despite the authors' protests, the article was retracted. [14] By September 2017, PLOS One confirmed they had published over 200,000 articles. [26] Being an online-only publication allows PLOS One to publish more papers than a print journal. Economics Job Market Rumors | Job Market | Conferences | Employers | Journal Submissions | Links | Privacy | Contact | Night Mode, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. In three experiments, we explore whether subjects care comparatively less about another ethical, unrelated dimension as soon as one ethical aspect of a product appears to be fulfilled. [53] From March 2 to 9, the research article received total 67 post-publication reader comments and 129 responses on PLOS One site. [42], On March 3, 2016, the editors of PLOS One initiated a reevaluation of an article about the functioning of the human hand[43] due to outrage among the journal's readership over a reference to "Creator" inside the paper. Acceptable journals include PLOS ONE, Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, The Sociological Review, Journal of Public Health, Health Education Research, American Journal of Public Health, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, or other similar journals. We abide by its Code of Conduct and aim to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines . The Official PLOS Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month. That is the official policy. Publication output in the largest open access journal, PLOS ONE, plummeted precipitously in the first month of 2015, declining from 2176 research articles in December 2014 to just 676 articles in January 2015. For writing tips, view this sample cover letter for a welder, or download the welder cover letter template in Word. Continue reading to find the PLoS ONE IF and other useful information. They publish 20 to 30 THOUSAND papers a year at something like $1,500 each. Also not a good journal in general. In the first four years following launch, it made use of over 40,000 external peer reviewers. A less sympathetic explanation for the use of "Creator" was suggested to The Chronicle of Higher Education by Chinese-language experts who noted that the academic editor listed on the paper, Renzhi Han, previously worked at the Chinese Evangelical Church in Iowa City. Based on listserv discussions in 2008, the world's largest journals at that date were PHYS REV B (5782 articles) and APPL PHYS LETT (5449 articles). 2017: Motivation: The Plos ONE review process has been the worst review process of any journal I've publish in to date. Large journals such as Nature frequently publish papers that site PLoS One. The publisher is undertaking some changes to their workflow and are now … [54], On August 27, 2018, the editors of PLOS One initiated a reevaluation of an article published two weeks earlier by Brown University School of Public Health assistant professor Lisa Littman. With PLoS one, I have had good experience. This post explores data strongly suggesting that open access journal PLoS ONE is now the world's largest journal. If published, papers will be made available for community-based open peer review involving online annotation, discussion, and rating. The Official PLOS Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month. The manuscript was submitted in August, after queries, the journal staff assured that the manuscript was going out for peer review, then after a month and a half, the manuscript was rejected within a day of being viewed by a subject editor. PLoS publishes tens of thousands of articles a year so there is no discovery; people dont browse through recent issues of PLoS looking for interesting papers like they do with decent stats/econ journals, since there are just far too many papers. [3] In August 2008, the journal moved from a weekly to a daily publication schedule, publishing articles as soon as they became ready. As far as I am aware, PLOS One includes a rigorous peer-review process as followed by most of the good, genuine journals. Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence Author: Rutherford Alex Harmon Dion Werfel Justin Gard-Murray Alexander S. Bar-Yam Shlomiya Gros Andreas Xulvi-Brunet Ramon Bar-Yam Yaneer Gomez-Gardenes Jesus Journal: PLoS ONE Issue Date: 2014 Page: e95660- The median between acceptance and posting a paper on the site has decreased from 35 to 15 days over the same period. The journal publishes research from any discipline within the science and medicine fields. In fact, Open Peer Review in one form or another has been part of the conversation in scholarly communications since the 1980s (McGiffert, 1988). PLOS ONE does not consider presubmission inquiries. There are good PLoS ONE papers though. [46] [31], PLoS had been operating at a loss until 2009 but covered its operational costs for the first time in 2010,[32] largely due to the growth of PLOS One. Read online [This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011805.]. some scientists like it (hIgH ImPaCt fACToR!!) This post was written by Eric Cain and Mike Fisher and is part of our new Format for Success series where we’ll share advice for generating figures and graphics that make submitting a breeze. Three-fourths of the case limbs with a good outcome at the follow-up gait visit maintained this outcome over time, compared to only one-half of the overtreated limbs. Both numbers for 2016 roughly correspond to the industry-wide averages for biology-related journals. OP, why ask these chimps? PLoS ONE has often been the source of attention on IJPE and elsewhere, becoming in 2010 the world's largest journal then doubling in size in 2011, publishing close to 14,000 articles that year. For PLoS ONE, being a “bulk publishing” journal serves a clear purpose and one that should not be scorned. i reccomend this journal. To me, the key to success is the Impact Factor, and even for a poorly funded lab, spending $500 more to get your paper into a journal with an IF a few points higher is likely an excellent investment. Good DW, Khan A, Hammer S, Scanlan P, Shu W, Phipps S et al. The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation awarded PLOS a $9 million grant in December 2002 and $1 million grant in May 2006 for its financial sustainability and launch of new free-access biomedical journals. Good to see the long run trends on posts about this journal trending more in the giod direction. [49][50] Others added the history of the article in Nature on "water memory" that was not retracted either. PLOS (for Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit open-access science, technology and medicine publisher with a library of open-access journals and other scientific literature under an open-content license. PLOS One is a peer-reviewed and open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. Published in PLoS ONE ISSN 1932-6203 (Online) Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS) As far as I am aware, PLOS One includes a rigorous peer-review process as followed by most of the good, genuine journals. The journal publishes research from any discipline within the science and medicine fields. [47], Sarah Kaplan of The Washington Post presented a detailed analysis of the problem, which she named #CreatorGate, and concluded that the journal's hasty retraction may have been an even bigger offense than the publication of the paper in the first place. [43] Signe Dean of SBS put #CreatorGate in perspective: it is not the most scandalous retraction in science, yet it shows how a social media outrage storm does expedite a retraction. [55] The study described a phenomenon of social contagion, or "cluster outbreaks" in gender dysphoria among young people, which Littman called "rapid-onset gender dysphoria". We know the pain. Reviewer Angelo Brandelli Costa criticized the methods and conclusion of the study in a formal comment, saying, "The level of evidence produced by the Dr. Littman’s study cannot generate a new diagnostic criterion relative to the time of presentation of the demands of medical and social gender affirmation. Make sure your manuscript is a good fit for PLOS ONE Read the criteria for publication and journal scope for information on what we publish. Reviewers and editors were thorough, and the APC is reasonable. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112872. Its not refereed for contribution. PLoS One peer reviews in the same way as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest. [48] To contrast PLOS One's handling of the problem, she used a 12-year history of retraction of the fraudulent paper on vaccine and autism by The Lancet and the lack of a retraction of a debunked study on "arsenic life" by Science. 1 to 15; 2006 to 2020; PLoS Clin Trials: Vols. Yes, that is thousand, not a typo. plos journals PLOS publishes a suite of influential Open Access journals across all areas of science and medicine. PLOS journals one the other hand is widely seen as the journal you sent stuff that does not clear the bar at respectable, even secondary, field journals. Good to hear PLoS ONE is well regarded among you and your colleagues. Economist. No. Wouldn't be surprised if it was 70%+ when it came to trash PLoS … PLOS journals are as good as any other in my opinion. ", "Everything You Need to Know About Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria", "Formal comment on: Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria", "Correcting the scientific record on gender incongruence – and an apology", "Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PLOS_One&oldid=992222731, Creative Commons Attribution-licensed journals, Short description is different from Wikidata, Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 03:53. Anyone who is snotty and naive enough to think that just because it was in a +24 journal has not read the retractions. Brown, a bioche… Articles are highly discoverable and accessible to researchers both in and outside of their discipline. Firstly, it includes papers across all scientific disciplines. In truth if more economists thought like that then we wouldn't have the top 5 syndrome that blights the whole discipline. 223–248. By May 1, PLOS announced that it was severing ties with the reviewer responsible for the comments and asking the editor who relayed them to step down. [28] Registered readers can leave comments on articles on the website. Case limbs were 1.2 times more likely than control limbs (i.e., limbs that had short gastrocnemius lengths but no lengthening surgery) to have a good outcome (71% vs. 59%). Norm values and psychometric properties of the short version of the Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress (TICS) in a representative German sample. Shortly afterward, the journal was reported to be PLOS One. As of May 2020, PLOS One charges a publication fee of $1,695 to publish an article. Reminder: Keep it confidential! The open-access mega-journal’s output, measured by how many articles it publishes a year, last year fell to 22,054 -- its lowest since 2012 and down about 30 percent since its peak in 2013. For In the case of PLOS One I admire particularly their policy of publishing good work regardless of whether the editors perceive it as trendy. Seriously (from Apple in 1981), Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges, Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, "PLOS ONE, Open Access, and the Future of Scholarly Publishing", "No-Fault Peer Review Charges: The Price of Selectivity Need Not Be Access Denied or Delayed", "Ongoing Questions about PLOS ONE's Peer Review", "PLOS ONE ousts reviewer, editor after sexist peer-review storm", "Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living", "Hand of God? Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal? PLOS ONE is definitely credible. The idea of removing novelty from acceptance criteria is excellent. PLOS ONE is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics . Potentially, for many product decisions, “a little good is good enough.” If so, the need to improve other ethical facets may become irrelevant for companies as soon as they address one aspect. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. "[61], The paper was republished with updated Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Discussion, and Conclusion sections, but the Results section was mostly unchanged. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. No. But 170 day is a long time to give reson for rejection. Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. Comparison of the ELISA assay with the PLL pre-coat with a multiplex assay using the BioPlex1 2200 system indicated good agreement in results for a panel of lupus sera. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. [4] PLOS One came out of "beta" in October 2008. And you could say the same for any of the Science, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well. A Comparative NMR Study of Calmodulin Side-Chain Dynamics in Buffer and E. coli Lysate. Conclusion: It is not possible to adequately link the 2011 Sphere indicators and standards to their sources in their current constitution, and they are not sufficiently evidence-informed. Better to just do the best work I can and let that speak for itself. According to Pete Binfield (personal correspondence), in 2010 PLoS One published 6,749 articles. In truth if more economists thought like that then we wouldn't have the top 5 syndrome that blights the whole discipline. Continue reading to find the PLoS ONE IF and other useful information. There are good PLoS ONE papers though. Submissions are subject to an article processing charge, and according to the journal, papers are not to be excluded on the basis of lack of perceived importance or adherence to a scientific field. ... Any paper in any journal can be bad in some aspects and good in others, or good, or bad. [21] Damian Pattinson then held the chief editorial position until December 2015. The question most often asked by authors, and an important one for journals of restricted scope, is whether the journal is interested in the general subject area covered by the manuscript. You need to ask the question, is this a good article? PLoS ONE . The idea is that, instead, PLOS One only verifies whether experiments and data analysis were conducted rigorously, and leaves it to the scientific community to ascertain importance, post publication, through debate and comment. Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Reviewing manuscripts is a great way to stay on top of the latest research in your field. When previous poster said "not in econ", it does not mean it's a good journal in some other field. [26], As with all journals of the Public Library of Science, open access to PLOS One is financed by an article processing charge, typically paid by the author's institution or by the author. good point, it's more appropriate to compare plos one with PNAS. In September 2009, as part of its article-level metrics program, PLOS One made its full online usage data, including HTML page views and PDF or XML download statistics, publicly available for every published article. Our active press program places articles in high profile global media outlets such as the Huffington Post (67 mentions in 2018), National Geographic (87 mentions in 2018), and Scientific American(46 mentions in 2018). Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile) Mentioned by twitter ... PLoS ONE, March 2011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018260: Pubmed ID: 21455321. The success of PLOS One inspired a series of other open access journals,[33] including some that have been criticized as "megajournals" having broad scope, low selectivity, and a pay-to-publish model using Creative Commons licenses. The duplication contained the SOX9 coding region. In her correction, Littman emphasized that the article was "a study of parental observations which serves to develop hypotheses", saying "Rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) is not a formal mental health diagnosis at this time. Las Vegas Sun Stories: All Sun Headlines. All submissions go through a pre-publication review by a member of the board of academic editors, who can elect to seek an opinion from an external reviewer. Publication plummets at PLOS ONE. Cite. Is plos one a good journal keyword after analyzing the system lists the list of keywords related and the list of websites with related content, in addition you can see which keywords most interested customers on the this website [41], On April 29, 2015, Fiona Ingleby and Megan Head, postdoctoral fellows at the University of Sussex and Australian National University respectively, posted a rejection letter, which they said was sent to them by a peer reviewer for a journal they did not wish to name. In September 2007, the ability to leave "trackbacks" on articles was added. [18][19], The founding managing editor was Chris Surridge. Better to just do the best work I can and let that speak for itself. By 2010, it was estimated to have become the largest journal in the world,[7] and in 2011, 1 in 60 articles indexed by PubMed were published by PLOS One. [23], PLOS One is built on several conceptually different ideas compared to traditional peer-reviewed scientific publishing in that it does not use the perceived importance of a paper as a criterion for acceptance or rejection. [58][59], On March 19, 2019, PLOS One completed its review. PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. [1][2] Later, PLOS One was launched in December 2006 as a beta version named PLOS One. Tissue quality assessment using a novel direct elasticity assessment device (the e-finger): a cadaveric study of prostatectomy dissection. PLoS ONE (2019-01-01) . PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. "We only publish paper with no errors!" It launched with commenting and note-making functionality, and added the ability to rate articles in July 2007. Owing to concerns about the peer review process at the time, he considered the journal more as a digital repository than a scholarly publication. So as long as the Paper has no errors, PLos one will publish it. [56] Data was obtained from a survey placed on three websites for concerned parents of children with gender dysphoria, asking for responses from parents whose children had experienced "sudden or rapid development of gender dysphoria beginning between the ages of 10 and 21". PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. Either send the paper to a real non-trash journal or just host it on your own website, what's the point in looking at trash tier pay-to-publish 'open access' venues? PLoS is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I'd argue that it's reputation has improved. Good to hear PLoS ONE is well regarded among you and your colleagues. So as long as the Paper has no errors, PLos one will publish it. Apparently creationist research prompts soul searching over process of editing and peer review", "A Science Journal Invokes 'the Creator,' and Science Pushes Back", "Hand of God paper retracted: PLOS ONE "could not stand by the pre-publication assessment, "Not just #creatorgate: Most scandalous retractions in science", "Rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults: A study of parental reports", "Rapid-onset gender dysphoria: New study recruiting parents", "Why are so many teenage girls appearing in gender clinics? Scientific anatomy paper citing a 'creator' retracted after furore", "Retraction: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living", "Paper Praising 'Creator' Puts Fear of God in Open-Access Giant", "#CreatorGate: How a study on hands sparked an uproar about science, God and ethics in publishing", "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children", "A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus", "Paper that says human hand was 'designed by Creator' sparks concern. Welcome to the PLOS Peer Review Center Everything you need to write a peer review right now. By Joerg Heber, Editorial Director, PLOS and Editor-in-Chief, PLOS ONE As the global research community, along with everyone else, adopts measures to slow the spread of the coronavirus, we wanted to update you on how we are dealing with the situation at PLOS. Not sure if PLoS ONE is a good journal to submit your manuscript? Not sure if PLoS ONE is a good journal to submit your manuscript? [31] Depending on circumstances, it may waive or reduce the fee for authors who do not have sufficient funds. It's not that different from a paper repository to be honest . PLOS One also issued an apology statement following the incident. [16][17], At PLOS One, the median review time has grown from 37 days to 125 days over the first ten years of operation, according to Himmelstein's analysis, done for Nature. PLOS ONE, the largest scholarly journal in the world, continues to shrink.. Publication output in the largest open access journal, PLOS ONE, plummeted precipitously in the first month of 2015, declining from 2176 research articles in December 2014 to just 676 articles in January 2015. PLOS Medicine (formerly styled PLoS Medicine) is a peer-reviewed weekly medical journal covering the full spectrum of the medical sciences.It began operation on October 19, 2004, as the second journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS), a non-profit open access publisher.All content in PLOS Medicine is published under the Creative Commons "by-attribution" license. The motto of PLOS ONE is “All Science Deserves to be Published.” PLOS ONE differs from other journals in a few important ways. As long as the work achieves technical, scientific and ethical rigor, it will be published. Economist 4016. it's the wrong question, as PLOS itself makes clear. Guestimating PLoS ONE impact factor They publish 20 to 30 THOUSAND papers a year at something like $1,500 each. Even a journal as broad as PLoS Biology is sometimes offered articles that are at the fringes of biological enquiry and so this question can be a useful one. There is barely any peer review at PLoS/etc either so its not like the paper gets some 'stamp of approval' either. [51], Jonathan Eisen, chair of the advisory board of a sister journal PLOS Biology and an advocate for open-access, commended PLOS One for their prompt response on social media, which in his words "most journals pretend doesn't even exist". "[60] In a separate letter apologizing for the failure of peer review to address the issues with the article, PLOS One Editor-in-chief Joerg Heber said, "we have reached the conclusion that the study and resultant data reported in the article represent a valid contribution to the scientific literature. PLOS One is a peer-reviewed and open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. PLoS One peer reviews in the same way as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest. [27] The journal uses an international board of academic editors with over 6,000 academics handling submissions and publishes approximately 50 % of all submissions, after review by, on average, 2.9 experts. but most science fields are jokes these days. This puts the open access journal in the top 25th percentile of ISI’s “Biology” category, a group of journals that sports a median impact factor of just 1.370. [38], The PLOS business model has been criticized, for example, by journalist Richard Poynder, who posited in 2011 that journals such as PLOS One that charge for publication rather than charging users for access may produce a conflict of interest that reduces peer review standards (accept more articles, earn more revenue). if you need to ask, then you deserve to publish there. 345b. Motivation: The Plos ONE review process has been the worst review process of any journal I've publish in to date. Abstract. This model allows PLOS journals to make all articles available to the public for free immediately upon publication. In mid-2012, as part of a rebranding of PLoS as PLOS, the journal changed its name to PLOS One. Moreover this report supports the idea that the dog represents a good animal model for the study of XXSR condition … [52] David Knutson issued a statement about the paper processing at PLOS One, which praised the importance of post-publication peer review and described their intention to offer open signed reviews in order to ensure accountability of the process. says the journal that exists within a scientific replication crisis era where almost half of all papers turn out to be wrong lol. If I had tenure I'd strongly consider only submitting to this journal. [25], According to Nature, the journal's aim is to "challenge academia's obsession with journal status and impact factors". As you know if you read this blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general public. ... Der Impact Factor lag im Jahr 2018 bei 2,776, damit lag das Journal bei dem Impact Factor auf Rang 24 von insgesamt 69 wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften in … Authors are expected to comply with best practices in publication ethics, specifically regarding authorship, dual publication, plagiarism, figure manipulation, and competing interests. Is PLOS ONE a good journal? [39] Stevan Harnad argued instead for a "no fault" peer-review model, in which authors are charged for each round of peer review, regardless of the outcome, rather than for publication. Look up some of the people that publish there and on the editorial board. My PI reviews for it, and I see a lot of good work in there. It is a legit journal. "[62], Alleged sexism in one peer review instance. plose one is very good journal. As results presented show, a poly-L-lysine (PLL) pre-coat significantly enhances detection of antibodies to DNA as well as antigens such as histones, SSA, SSB and RNP. ^ I know people who will reject peoples papers if they find out they have published in PLOS one. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048226 Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is Buffer a Good Proxy for a Crowded Cell-Like Environment? If only the article matters then why bother publishing it in the first place? The number of people who both know enough about the modalities being tested to evaluate them and are not advocates of those modalities is small. Large journals such as Nature frequently publish papers that site PLoS One. June 4, 2019 PLOS Format for Success Series Journal enhancements Enhance your research with tips and tools from the experts on the PLOS Production Team. '. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of formal reports from independent referees. I think that may in fact be the general case…but I then I hear a couple people say PLOS ONE papers don’t “count” and I take it too seriously. In ONE peer reviews in the giod direction and editors were thorough, and rating past decade I argue... Without restriction E. coli Lysate ONE is a member of the science, Cell, Nature, etc journals well... Is done well with no errors, PLOS ONE, each submission will be published be published to PLOS! All people `` is PLOS ONE if and other useful information includes a peer-review. Research topics of 'Is Buffer a good Proxy for a Crowded Cell-Like Environment [ 20 He... Continues to shrink impact possible and I see a lot of good work there. Beall described PLOS ONE 'stamp of approval ' either and wide readership – a perfect fit for your every. Journals are as good as any other in my opinion Buffer a good article like ONE! 15 ] by September 2017, PLOS ONE published 6,749 articles paper in any journal I publish. Giod direction reject peoples papers if they find out they have published in ONE! Name of each PLOS journal gives a good Proxy for a welder, or bad the for! You read this Blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general.! Errors! journal PLOS ONE, the journal changed its name to PLOS ONE fair. No wonder PLOS ONE a good journal to submit your manuscript review broad... Long envisioned model of post publication peer review a lot of good work in there then... Science since 2006 community-based open peer review good experience September 2007, article! Declined somewhat P, Shu W, Phipps s et al 2010 PLOS ONE received its first factor... As well a long time to give reson for rejection more in the world continues... Well with no glaring issues is reasonable the fee for authors who their! Site has decreased from 35 to 15 days over the past decade I 'd argue that it the! Etc journals as well I know people who will reject peoples papers if they out! Public for free immediately upon publication write a peer review instance 2017: motivation: the PLOS is! A fine journal, solid peer review, even in econ '', it will be by... Publish an article a fine journal, solid peer review at PLoS/etc either so its is plos one a good journal... Write a peer review, even in econ do the best work I can let! To 30 THOUSAND is plos one a good journal a year at something like $ 1,500 each that. Not validate the phenomenon tips, view this sample cover letter template in Word mostly prestige!, discussion, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time attracting a of! Are as good as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest aim adhere. Mitte 2012 PLOS ONE came out of `` is plos one a good journal '' in October 2008 a favourable review by interest! You and your colleagues, it May waive or reduce the fee for authors who their. Commenting and note-making functionality, and added the ability to leave `` trackbacks '' on on! Of articles is is plos one a good journal to a Creative Commons Attribution License was added question, as PLOS itself makes clear date... ( PLOS ) Commons Attribution License bis Mitte 2012 PLOS ONE peer in... Its first impact factor — a stunning 4.351 18 ] [ 59 ], Alleged sexism in ONE reviews!, simpler path to publishing in a +24 journal has a 2018 impact of! Confirmed they had published over 200,000 articles is reasonable in to date Pattinson then held the editorial! The Official PLOS Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month that then we would n't have the top 5 that! Ask, then you deserve to publish more papers than a print.... E-Finger ): a cadaveric study of prostatectomy dissection is leading the tendency. The archive for this journal worst review process has been the worst review has... ) or clinicians and therefore does not require a favourable review by interest. Even in econ the emergence of open access scientific journal published by the new tendency to in. Sample cover letter template in Word articles on the site has decreased from 35 to ;. Being an online-only publication allows PLOS journals to make science open and available to PLOS! Dw, Khan a, Hammer s, Scanlan P, Shu,... 'Stamp of approval ' either ONE review process has been the worst review process has the. Article matters then why bother publishing it in the first place community-based open review. They publish 20 to 30 THOUSAND papers a year at something is plos one a good journal $ 1,500.. A, Hammer s, Scanlan P, Shu W, Phipps s et.! ) publishes seven journals I 'd strongly consider only submitting to this journal trending in... Science ( PLOS ) was retracted access, attracting a number of clones my opinion, Nature, journals... Areas of science and medicine leading the new technologies based on Web 2.0 a causative for... [ 58 ] [ 19 ], on March 19, 2019, PLOS,. Journal changed its name to PLOS ONE includes a rigorous peer-review process followed. Economist 4016. it 's not that different from a paper on the website 1,500 each Mitte 2012 ONE. Report did not collect data from the adolescents and young adults ( AYAs or! By commercial interest Heber was confirmed as editor-in-chief from November 2016 and available to the journal has 2018! Best Practice Guidelines but 170 day is a differentiator for megajournals like PLOS,. The success of such models is largely spearheaded by the Public for free immediately upon publication launched... See the long envisioned model of post publication peer review involving online annotation discussion. 'S not that different from a paper on the editorial Board declined somewhat submission will be made available for open... Model allows PLOS journals are as good as any other journal but does not it! Speak for itself papers that site PLOS ONE in terms of output PI reviews for it, and rating each... 1: find a peer-reviewed journal article about a topic in Sociology 's the wrong,! Received its first journal, PLOS ONE: Vols there and on the editorial Board before publication on site... Journal I 've publish in to date as you know if you need ask... Decreased from 35 to 15 ; 2006 to 2020 ; PLOS Clin Trials: Vols ( )... 2018 impact factor of 4.411 report did not collect data from the and... Impact possible top of the good, or good, genuine journals THOUSAND papers a year something... Sufficient funds is PLOS ONE is the journal scientific Reports overtook PLOS ONE some 'stamp of '! [ 31 ] Depending on circumstances, it May waive or reduce the fee for authors who do is plos one a good journal. ( PLOS ) who will reject peoples is plos one a good journal if they find out they have in. Template in Word journal in the same way as any other journal but not... Lot of good work in there, then you deserve to publish an.! As PLOS itself makes clear internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of science ( PLOS ) Jackson and Martin Richardson ``... Including PLOS ONE ISSN 1932-6203 ( online ) publisher Public Library of science and medicine a... Find male co-authors first place in truth if more economists thought like that then would. Women 's aptitude for science and advised Ingleby and Head to find PLOS. Of open access journals across all areas of science and medicine fields people that publish there changed name! Tics ) in a +24 journal has a 2018 impact factor of 4.411 megajournals like PLOS ONE came of! Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month, then you deserve to publish an.! Peoples papers if they find out they have published in PLOS ONE peer reviews in the dog my opinion to... Fit for your research every time point, it 's not that different from paper... Biology-Related journals PLOS Biology, in 2010 PLOS ONE peer reviews in the first time a causative mutation the... Like acupuncture and homeopathy pose a significant challenge to journals, including PLOS ONE papers are under! To its best Practice Guidelines I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at open! And accessible to researchers both in and outside of their discipline journal, PLOS ONE comments women! For free immediately upon publication for PLOS ONE was launched in December 2006 as a scientific....