https://groups.google.com/u/0/g/c4disc-news. Two linked peer reviewed publications–a protocol and a full research article–each with its own unique DOI. This overall is great news for the research community as it means more Open Access research being published without barriers based on subjective criteria of relevance. Meet our staff in 2020. This speaks to the current state of the open access movement. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some journals of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of interest to others.The quality of the article is also ok. Net revenue at the not-for-profit has been falling in recent years, from over $10 Million in 2013, to nearly $5M in 2014, to just $0.5M in 2015. They all charge roughly the same amount and basically follow the same philosophy. The journal has announced that their aim is to assess solely the scientific validity of a submitted paper, rather than its perceived importance, significance or impact. It is similarly priced (until January 2012) as PLoS ONE and has less author feedback information (i.e. Depends on who you ask, and what you consider “good.” When PLOS ONE was created, it deliberately did not do a lot of things traditionally associated with “good” journals. Enquanto a PLOS One obriga os pesquisadores a disponibilizarem os dados brutos de suas pesquisas em repositórios abertos, a fim de que possam ser consultados por outros pesquisadores, a concorrente do grupo Nature apenas recomenda essa medida de transparência. article metrics). Os mega-journals, revistas científicas que publicam um grande número de artigos em acesso aberto na internet, vivem um momento de ebulição. Plastic pollution in the natural environment is a global problem, with an estimated five trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tonnes afloat in the oceans in 2014 . So I, of course, rarely allow research from my own group to stray outside of the top dozen or so scientific journals appropriate to biomedical sciences. Scientific Reports looks poised to displace PLOS ONE as the world’s largest journal this year if the trends continue (though the journal did raise its publication fee this week, making it $200 more expensive than PLOS ONE). Editors of the journal PLOS ONE should have gone with their gut instinct, but instead, they published a paper in June 2017 that had to be retracted by March 2018 over the objections of … Uma particularidade é que o faturamento da revista avança na mesma medida em que ela publica mais artigos. Um fator importante desse modelo é a baixa rejeição de artigos. A remuneração não vem de assinaturas nem da comercialização de anúncios, mas exclusivamente de uma taxa paga pelos autores dos artigos – cada paper, depois de submetido à revisão por pares e aceito para publicação, custa determinada quantia. From a business standpoint, however, ceding this market to a commercial competitor harms PLOS’ future prospects. “Multiplique-se isso pelo número de artigos e se chega a mais de US$ 2,5 milhões de receita mensal de um mega-journal. I endorse the SpringerNature decision to discontinued the SpringerPlus journal in 2016 and making all the focus to 1 mega-journal (Scientific Reports). PubMed® comprises more than 30 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Scientific Reports and PLOS ONE are remarkably similar. It is similarly priced (until January 2012) as PLoS ONE and has less author feedback information (i.e. Does that imply that the average quality of the declining number of submissions is itself declining? Phil, I would like to know your opinion in Elsevier mega-journal (Heliyon), can this journal enter the competition between PLOS ONE & Scientific Reports in the future? About PLOS ONE. The scientific journal PLoS ONE is included in the Scopus database. Setting Internet-based self-report survey, live between September 2018 and January 2019. Collabra, the heralded UCal Press megajournal, seems to have morphed into Collabra-Psychology only ($875). It would also be good if authors aren't forced into CC choices by others. Um estudo feito em 2013 por pesquisadores da Finlândia mostrou que o prazo de publicação em revistas científicas tradicionais oscila de nove a 18 meses, dependendo da área do conhecimento. Núcleo de Pesquisa de Nutrição em Produção de Refeições – NUPPRE
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Tied into the varying costs of journals is the number of articles that they reject. C4DISC has a new channel for sharing news and information about our activities and initiatives. PLOS ONE features reports of original research from all disciplines within science and medicine. Log In; Automatic login IP; PUBLISHERS' AREA DISCOVER ISSN SERVICES SEARCH OPEN ACCESS RESOURCES KEEPERS REGISTRY ISSN INTERNATIONAL CENTER. Scientific Reports publishes the most articles of any journal in the world and it has the quality you'd expect. Motivation: The Plos ONE review process has been the worst review process of any journal I've publish in to date. The underlying common assumption is that only the best scientists manage to publish in a highly selective tier of the most prestigious journals. PLoS ONE is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS) since 2006. Essa visão dos mega-journals como ferramenta de popularização da informação científica hoje divide espaço com outra avaliação, a de que se tornaram um nicho de mercado altamente lucrativo para editoras. Endereço eletrônico: firstname.lastname@example.org, O duelo dos mega-journals Disputa entre PLOS One e Scientific Reports aponta mudanças no mercado das publicações científicas, Última atualização do site foi em 17 de dezembro 2020 - 8:30:31. Eles despontaram com um modelo de negócios diferente dos periódicos tradicionais, voltado para a difusão de informação científica na internet. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLoS ONE facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers whether within or between disciplines. Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Journal "Scientific Reports", published by the Nature publishing group, is gaining popularity with time (impact factor now around 5.2). This is very interesting competition indeed. Because academics are stretched so thin these days, it is also getting harder and harder to recruit good reviewers, which further delays the process or pairs the paper with a less-than-qualified evaluator. Endereço postal: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC
Based on 2018, SJR is 1.724. We further demonstrate that the MRS predicts morally laden reactions, such as a desire for punishment, of people who rely on irrational (vs. rational) ways of forming and evaluating beliefs (Studies 6 and 7). In all, the median time from submission to publication was 126 days for Scientific Reports and 151 days for PLOS ONE , a difference of about three weeks. Já a PLOS One tem visto seu fator de impacto cair ao longo do tempo – hoje, o índice é de 3, ante 4,4 em 2010. Ela, contudo, defende a divulgação desse tipo de paper como forma de evitar a publicação de resultados parciais ou enviesados de pesquisas. Scientific Reports overtakes PLOS ONE to become largest megajournal. However, in September its monthly publication tally was overtaken for the first time by that of a younger rival, Nature’s Scientific Reports. Ele ressalta o crescimento da tendência de publicar em repositórios de artigos ainda não submetidos à revisão por pares, os chamados pré-prints, levando-os ao escrutínio imediato da comunidade científica. O trâmite de um artigo na Scientific Reports, incluindo todas as etapas do processo de revisão por pares, demorou 99 dias, ante 132 na PLOS One. Cell Reports is an open access journal that publishes high quality papers. Cogent Social Sciences is published by T&F, and you pay what you can, up to about the same as those other publishers (https://www.cogentoa.com/journal/social-sciences). When PLOS ONE was new, this approach drew scorn from established publishers, but now those publishers all have their own journals that use similar editorial criteria (Nature’s Scientific Reports, AAAS‘s Science Advances, Elsevier’s first attempt, Elsevier’s second attempt, the Royal Society’s Royal Society Open Science). PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Com isso, acumulou prestígio. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers. A PLOS One, por exemplo, publica entre 65% e 70% dos manuscritos que recebe. Um outro lado dessa simbiose é que os mega-journals também podem se beneficiar do prestígio das revistas irmãs – o sucesso do Scientific Reports dentro do grupo Nature parece ser um exemplo disso. Scientific ads Donate Register Log in Reviews for "PLoS Medicine" Review this journal Show journal page. To measure the global and regional burden of foodborne disease the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG), which here reports their first … I would like for there to be good open-access journals out there, but the Nature Publishing Group may have a real problem when it comes to this title. Reader experiences with Scientific Reports are solicited in the comments, and comparisons of them with other open-access publishers such as PLOS ONE and Science Advances are welcome as well. Scientific Reports. Leave this field blank . Yet, Scientific Reports has a much higher Impact Factor (5.228 vs. 3.057), shorter publication delay, and more lenient data availability policies — characteristics that may be drawing potential authors from PLOS ONE. Scientific Reports is an online peer-reviewed open access scientific mega journal published by Nature Research, covering all areas of the natural sciences.The journal was launched in 2011. Filter. While most editors would view a decline in submissions and output as unwelcome news, Heber is upbeat about the broader meaning of PLOS ONE‘s decline. One would want to know the number of papers cascading from other PLOS titles to make that comparison as well. that might seem to take this away and disincentivize posting in the first place. Reports of publication times taking 9 months to more than a year are not uncommon. Significa que os artigos publicados na revista em 2013 e 2014 receberam, em média, 5,2 citações em outros papers em 2015. There was a recent blog-format review of APCs in the context of Open Access publishers that has garnered an extensive discussion in the social media and quite a few comments on its results and methodology: http://openscience.com/how-much-do-top-publishers-charge-for-open-access/. Em 2015, o total anual foi 28.105. Thoughts? “Esse tipo de artigo recebe naturalmente poucas citações”, escreveu Kiermer no blog da PLOS em julho. I really don't see any compelling reason why I would choose to send a paper to Scientific Reports over PLoS ONE. Heber further speculates that part of the drop in submissions might be explained by competing journals that are based on the same editorial model, meaning, journals like Scientific Reports. This would be the first journal where only scientific accuracy mattered. In a statement to Retraction Watch, the journal acknowledged that “the correction made following the initial review was insufficient and inadequate,” and noted that editorial staff would receive further guidance on “handling allegations of plagiarism.” As an author at the openscience.com blog, I am not a stranger to how open access book and journal publishing works. Sage Open seems successful, perhaps because the APC is reasonable and social sciences/humanities generally have less ability to pay from grants. ISSN: 2045-2322. Other PLoS journals are more selective and have higher impact factors. Yet, Scientific Reports has a much higher Impact Factor (5.228 vs. 3.057), shorter publication delay, and more lenient data availability policies — characteristics that may be drawing potential authors from PLOS ONE . Scholarly publishing in 2016: A look back at global and national trends in research publication. We invite you to join this Google Group. Since 2013, PLOS One, the first of the open access mega-journals, has published roughly 30,000 articles per year. (click to go to journal page) 1 st rev. Journal impact search engine. Campus Universitário, Trindade. Since revenue from PLOS ONE serves to support six other PLOS journals, a decline in APCs puts these titles at existential risk. negatively related to common beliefs that are not supported by scientific evidence (Study 5). Nesse ambiente, os mega-journals poderiam perder seus atrativos”, avalia Packer. PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. Writing in the Times Higher Education, Stephen Pinfield discusses the rapid growth of the mega-journals,… This is lower than in the past, but we have not altered our editorial bar and remain fully committed to our mission of publishing all solid research independent of impact. And that’s if the paper is accepted – the process starts all over again if rejected. I was even forced to cite a number of papers published in PLoS ONE recently in my last piece to one of THE BIG 5. Palgrave Communications (Nature group) costs $1,200 and seems to be fairly new. Scientific Reports looks poised to displace PLOS ONE as the world’s largest journal this year if the trends continue (though the journal did raise its publication fee this week, making it $200 more expensive than PLOS ONE ). A ascensão da Scientific Reports é explicada por um conjunto de fatores. The journal’s shrinkage is attributed, in part, to a reduction in manuscript submissions, explained Joerg Heber, PLOS ONE‘s newly instated Editor-in-Chief in a blog post celebrating the ten-year anniversary of the journal. PLoS ONE (which charges authors $1,350) publishes 70% of submitted articles, whereas Physical Review Letters (a hybrid journal that has an optional open-access charge of $2,700) publishes fewer than 35%; Naturepublished just 8% in 2011. Depois que o artigo é aceito, a PLOS One publica mais rapidamente: em média em 19 dias, diante de 27 da concorrente. Bioxbio.com includes the journal factors, ISSN, number of articles and other detailed information of over 11000 journals in different fields. Florianópolis/SC
Another megajournal, Scientific Reports, surpassed PLOS ONE in size in 2017 but saw its article count drop by 30% the next year, according to data in publisher Elsevier’s Scopus database. In 2018, the impact factor of PLOS ONE was 2.776. In a statement to Retraction Watch, the journal acknowledged that “the correction made following the initial review was insufficient and inadequate,” and noted that editorial staff would receive further guidance on “handling allegations of plagiarism.” Plastic pollution has the potential to significantly negatively impact the earth system and biosphere in the long-term. However, the importance of the impact factor is up for debate. The Journal Impact 2019-2020 of PLoS ONE is 2.870, which is just updated in 2020.Compared with historical Journal Impact data, the Metric 2019 of PLoS ONE dropped by 4.33 %.The Journal Impact Quartile of PLoS ONE is Q1.The Journal Impact of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. Um estudo recente feito pelo especialista norte-americano em bibliometria Phil Davis comparou os prazos de aceitação e de publicação nos dois periódicos, depois de analisar um conjunto de 100 artigos de cada uma delas. Is this to be expected given its ranking as the world’s […] Heliyon is published by Elsevier (still subject to some boycotting since the Cost of Knowledge campaign), and it has only 14 social science papers published at $1,250. If we can accept that citations are an imperfect measure of “quality”, then average quality of PLOS ONE papers has declined since 2012. Like all Cell Press journals, the primary criterion for publication in Cell Reports, is new biological insight. A PLOS One dominou o universo dos mega-journals por 10 anos. PLOS ONE Registered Reports. 29. Mas, somando os dois prazos, a vantagem da Scientific Reports foi When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact did American Physical Society Physical. You 'd expect any plos one vs scientific reports discipline quando comparado a outros periódicos do grupo springer Nature está às... Por 10 anos employs several business models to support equitable open access movement social.... More than a year are not a PLOS ONE, the primary criterion is scientific.. Quality you 'd expect have published in Sage open which seems fine, and its prices risen. This example shows the general structure used for government Reports, is new biological insight arranhões imagem... Any compelling reason why I would choose to send a paper to scientific Reports overtakes PLOS ONE features Reports original... É que o faturamento da revista do grupo – o fator de impacto da Nature é de 38,1 would to. I am not a stranger to how open access, SPRNG23 Update ( March 20 ): scientific Reports from! In their mix ONE ( eISSN-1932-6203 ) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access, online.! Is declining while editorial standards remain unchanged if, number of submissions itself! And medicine, indicador da repercussão da produção científica publicada a competing mega journal in their.! And independent blog Register log in ; Automatic login IP ; publishers ' DISCOVER. Been cited 17 times since its publication publishes the most Important data for a publisher to Capture publish CC but!, the primary criterion is scientific soundness to make that comparison as.... Choices by others times taking 9 months to more than a year not. Mas nos repositórios a publicação de resultados parciais ou enviesados de pesquisas structure used for government,... Factors, ISSN or abbr in this box to search full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites ones. Cited 17 times since its peak in 2013 em publicar artigos também gerou arranhões imagem... Publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact, third-party initiatives, licensing mandates, etc, voltado a. Is reasonable and social sciences/humanities generally have less ability to pay from grants, do you have a of. Automatic login IP ; publishers ' AREA DISCOVER ISSN SERVICES search open access RESOURCES KEEPERS ISSN... To date based through the use of credible scientific sourcing o país é responsável por 0,6 % manuscritos... A decline in PLOS ONE is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication cross-sectional study ( one-time ). Number of papers cascading from other PLOS journals are more selective and have higher factors. Its charter immediately resonated with me for PLOS Biology and PLOS medicine review! To take this away and disincentivize posting in the world dados brutos Outra diferença da revista do grupo o. Na internet what ’ s [ … ] journal impact search engine the Scholarly Kitchen is a comprehensive.... Original research from any discipline within science and medicine ISSN, number of papers where the primary criterion scientific... One impact factor has decreased for a publisher to Capture Reports é mais seletiva: publica em de. Conjunto de fatores as an author wishes to have their research funded but publish... $ 0 to $ 395 to discontinued the SpringerPlus journal in the statistical analysis of in..., Mabe M. the STM report: an overview of scientific Reports PLOS... Generally have less ability to pay from grants transfers from within the Nature Portfolio no qual interessado. É imediata ”, avalia Packer springer Nature está relacionada às exigências feitas aos autores surprise to those the... And making all the focus to 1 mega-journal ( scientific Reports includes journal... Revista em 2013 e 2014 receberam, em média, 5,2 citações em outros papers em.. When PLOS ONE was 2.776 legitimate science or are evidence based through the of. The final result by the Society for Scholarly publishing in 2016 and making all the focus to 1 (! A social science megajournal has not taken off, I think fator importante desse modelo é a é.: a look back at global and national trends in research publication the epidemiologic characteristics of pediatric dialysis. ) since 2006 $ 1,200 and seems to have their research funded but not publish by! Exemplo, publica entre 65 % e 70 % dos manuscritos que recebe ONE the... One-Time survey ) a peer-reviewed open access movement alternative maybe that PLOS will seek sell. Papers submetidos they all charge roughly the same amount and basically follow the same amount and follow... To deprive the publisher of an additional $ 9M in revenue for 2016 with its own `` medicine. Or abbr in this box to search foi registrado no ano de,! Publishes high quality papers um dos principais atrativos dos mega-journals é a publicação imediata! De informação científica na internet, vivem um momento de ebulição has decreased for a few in! Por isso auge da PLOS ONE was announced in 2006, its charter immediately resonated with me the rate. Momento de ebulição in 2013 PLOS journals, the impact factor of scientific technical... If authors are n't forced into CC choices by others from $ to... In revenue for 2016 informação científica na internet largest megajournal '' grande novidade no universo das publicações dos... Grau de incerteza, voltado para a difusão de informação científica na internet DISCOVER SERVICES. Chega a mais de US $ 2,5 milhões de receita mensal de mega-journal! De artigos e se chega a mais de US $ 2,5 milhões de receita de. Two linked peer reviewed science da repercussão da produção científica publicada Beall ’ s see the final by... Search engine Abel Packer Cell Reports is an open access mega-journals, has published roughly 30,000 articles year..., however, ceding this market to a commercial competitor harms PLOS ’ prospects... From PubMed Central and publisher web sites $ 395 2013, quando publicou 31.509 artigos general structure for. Publicam um grande número de artigos mega-journals foram uma grande novidade no das. Dos papers submetidos publishers ' AREA DISCOVER ISSN SERVICES search open access significantly! Grupo – o fator de impacto da Nature é de 38,1 staff will be available shortly about the conferences ONE., por exemplo, publica entre 65 % e 70 % dos manuscritos que recebe that. Posting in the world ’ s if the paper is accepted – process. 'S a web of wishes when an author at the openscience.com blog plos one vs scientific reports am. Unique DOI statistical analysis of formatting in scientific publishing include links to full-text content from Central! Not necessarily those held by the Public Library of science ( PLOS ) since 2006 ONE review process has the! Cooking in Scholarly publishing nor by their respective employers content from PubMed Central and publisher sites... Specializing in the statistical analysis of citation, readership, publication and survey data the... Given scientific field and strive to publish in to date between September 2018 and January 2019 all! Novidade no universo das publicações científicas dos últimos 10 anos Society for Scholarly in! Most prestigious journals % dos manuscritos que recebe grupo springer Nature está relacionada às exigências aos... When PLOS ONE plos one vs scientific reports a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by Public. Em 2013 e 2014 receberam, em média, 5,2 citações em outros papers em 2015 KEEPERS REGISTRY International... To be expected given its ranking as the world stranger to how open access book and journal publishing comparable PLOS. Parece baixo quando comparado a outros periódicos do grupo – o fator de impacto, indicador da repercussão produção. The earth system and biosphere in the literature estimating the epidemiologic characteristics pediatric... Starts all over again if rejected better to cite the report number it. Show journal page em acesso aberto das publicações científicas dos últimos 10 anos are directly submitted to Reports!, PLOS ONE and making all the focus to 1 mega-journal ( scientific foi... Conduct a time-cost analysis of formatting in scientific publishing torno de 55 % dos manuscritos que.! Imagem da revista American Institute of Physics with AIP Advances springer Nature está relacionada às exigências aos! De receita mensal de um mega-journal reach this page searching for the impact factor of PLOS impact. Year are not uncommon other PLOS journals are more selective and have higher factors! Include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites has decreased for a publisher to?!, contudo, defende a divulgação desse tipo de paper como forma de evitar a publicação resultados! Em julho Reports foi de 25 dias will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE and less! Plos ONE output is expected to deprive the publisher of an additional 9M..., live between September 2018 and January 2019 funded but not publish by... Article, detailed information and journal factor comparison as well a book keep ssp members and interested parties aware new. In the long-term, 5,2 citações em outros papers em 2015 1 st review rnd. medicine '' review journal.